<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Jazz Improv, Large Portion of Brain&#8217;s Prefrontal Region &#8216;takes 5&#8242; to Let Creativity Flow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netnewspublisher.com/jazz-improv-brain-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netnewspublisher.com/jazz-improv-brain-usage/</link>
	<description>World News, Headline and Breaking News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=337</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Smoliar</title>
		<link>http://www.netnewspublisher.com/jazz-improv-brain-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Smoliar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netnewspublisher.com/jazz-improv-brain-usage/#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>This study reveals the pitfalls of trying to study something as subtle as the practice of music in a laboratory environment.  First of all the opening reference to Coltrane is as challenging as it is relevant.  Scientific investigation can rarely assess any phenomenon that is not normative, and Coltrane&#039;s practices were anything but normative.  The November 17, 1962 Paris performance of &quot;My Favorite Things&quot; clocked in at almost 24 minutes;  and the extended durations of Coltrane&#039;s solos even earned him sardonic criticism from Miles Davis!  This is such a &quot;statistical outlier&quot; that I doubt that any examination of &quot;six highly trained jazz musicians&quot; will reveal very much.  In other words the most interesting hypotheses that would try to link brain activity to improvisational behavior are likely to be the ones that account for the behavior that is LEAST normative.

More important, however, is that improvisation is a SOCIAL practice that goes far beyond the relationship between soloists and instrument.  Improvisation is driven by the relationships that are taking place across the entire ensemble.  One cannot understand Coltrane&#039;s behavior without taking into account the other members of his quartet.  Any experiment that does not take this social dimension into account can only provide an impoverished body of data.  In fairness, however, the idea of designing an experiment that would yield more valid data is so challenging as to be virtually impossible, at least with current equipment.

This is an excellent example of what happens when we run up against the limitations of what Thomas Kuhn called &quot;normal science.&quot;  We need to reassess both the questions we ask and the methods we design to answer them.  Kuhn called this a &quot;paradigm shift.&quot;  Unfortunately, when funding for scientific research is limited, &quot;normal science&quot; tends to prevail;  and the result is a collection of well-funded scientists running in circles like a dog chasing its tail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study reveals the pitfalls of trying to study something as subtle as the practice of music in a laboratory environment.  First of all the opening reference to Coltrane is as challenging as it is relevant.  Scientific investigation can rarely assess any phenomenon that is not normative, and Coltrane&#8217;s practices were anything but normative.  The November 17, 1962 Paris performance of &#8220;My Favorite Things&#8221; clocked in at almost 24 minutes;  and the extended durations of Coltrane&#8217;s solos even earned him sardonic criticism from Miles Davis!  This is such a &#8220;statistical outlier&#8221; that I doubt that any examination of &#8220;six highly trained jazz musicians&#8221; will reveal very much.  In other words the most interesting hypotheses that would try to link brain activity to improvisational behavior are likely to be the ones that account for the behavior that is LEAST normative.</p>
<p>More important, however, is that improvisation is a SOCIAL practice that goes far beyond the relationship between soloists and instrument.  Improvisation is driven by the relationships that are taking place across the entire ensemble.  One cannot understand Coltrane&#8217;s behavior without taking into account the other members of his quartet.  Any experiment that does not take this social dimension into account can only provide an impoverished body of data.  In fairness, however, the idea of designing an experiment that would yield more valid data is so challenging as to be virtually impossible, at least with current equipment.</p>
<p>This is an excellent example of what happens when we run up against the limitations of what Thomas Kuhn called &#8220;normal science.&#8221;  We need to reassess both the questions we ask and the methods we design to answer them.  Kuhn called this a &#8220;paradigm shift.&#8221;  Unfortunately, when funding for scientific research is limited, &#8220;normal science&#8221; tends to prevail;  and the result is a collection of well-funded scientists running in circles like a dog chasing its tail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.netnewspublisher.com

Served from: www.netnewspublisher.com @ 2012-02-10 11:56:16 -->
